Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Moulton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 4, 1993PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMercure, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 23, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

We affirm. It is undisputed that claimant was hired as a driver/installer for a water conditioning service with the express understanding that he was to accumulate no further convictions on his operator’s license. During the period of employment (but not during working hours), claimant was stopped by the police and arrested for driving while intoxicated.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of James (Levine)New York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. In re the Claim of FrancisNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. In re the Claim of WrzesinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Im re the Claim of HannahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Department of Economic & Employment Development v. TaylorCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. TullySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  3. In re the Claim of KillorinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. In re the Claim of CremeensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. In re the Claim of WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API