Legal Opinion
Lewis Aaron Bowen v. A.I. Murphy, Warden and Attorney General, State of Oklahoma Jan Eric Cartwright and Tulsa County
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 23, 1982No. 81-1592PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Lewis Aaron Bowen appeals from the denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus, brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Bowen argues that the district court erred in failing to give him credit for the time he was imprisoned on vacated convictions and by not granting him an eviden-tiary…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Douglas F. Miller v. J. D. Cox, Superintendent of the Virginia State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
- United States Ex Rel. Smith v. RundleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
- Floyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
3Cited by9 opinions
- James Ray Steele v. Leroy Young, Warden Attorney General of the State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Payton v. AlbertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- David Earle Johnson v. Chase RivelandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Juanita Bryant v. Warden, Metropolitan Correctional Center of New York City and United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Silvester v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.