Legal Opinion
Doud v. Hodge
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 12, 1956No. Civ. A. No. 53 C 2322PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, George W. Doud, Donald Q. McDonald and J. Wesley Carlson, a partnership doing business as Bondified Systems, and Eugene Derrick, agent of said partnership, seek to enjoin the defendants from enforcing the provisions of the Illinois Community Currency Exchange Act (Ill.Rev.Stat.1955, c. 16%, §§ 30-56.3) against them on the ground that it violates the Fourteenth Amendment to the federal constitution in that it discriminates unlawfully against them and in favor of the American Express Company. The defendants are the Auditor of Public Accounts of the State…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Toomer v. WitsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- McDougall v. LuederIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
- Doud v. HodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Celanese Corp. of AmericaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
- Arthur Murray, Inc. v. HorstDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Morey v. DoudSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Huber Baking Company v. Stroehmann Brothers Company and Quality Bakers of America Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Jones v. Pepsi-Cola CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1963
- Morey v. DoudSupreme Court of the United States · 1957