Legal Opinion

Bossier Parish School Board v. Reno

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 8, 1994No. Civ. A. No. 94-1495 (LHS (USCA), CRR, GK)Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THREE-JUDGE COURT UNDER THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT

CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Before the Court is the Motion of George Price, Sr., et al, a group of African-American voters claiming that the Bossier Parish School Board redistricting plan has the purpose and effect of denying or abridging their right to vote on account of race or color. They seek leave to Intervene as Defendants under Rule 24(a)(2) and Rule 24(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court finds that the prospective Intervenors have satisfied the requirements of Rule 24(b)(2). Their…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. CostleDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1978
  2. South Carolina v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1984
  3. Humane Society of the United States v. ClarkDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API