Brunner v. Brunner

It is true that the master made a finding that the appellant had in his possession Government Bonds in the sum of $2500.00 and it was stated by the master that'they “would be considered as owned by the parties as an estate by the entireties.”

One of the several exceptions of the plaintiff-appellant-husband respecting the masters report was:

“Said conclusions should be that the charge of adultery is sufficiently proven and sustained by competent proofs offered. Said $2,500.00 in bonds in possession of plaintiff, having been purchased with the money of plaintiff, is his separate property and…