Tribeca Lending Corp. v. Bartlett
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*497Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J.), entered August 18, 2009, which, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination denying defendant’s motion to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Defendant demonstrated neither a reasonable excuse for his default nor a meritorious defense to this action (see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]). His excuse that the attorney he hired did not represent his interests does not address his own numerous failures preceding his alleged hiring of the attorney. Indeed, defendant’s personal check made payable…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Tribeca Lending Corp. v. BartlettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Tribeca Lending Corp. v. BartlettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Bartlett v. Tribeca Lending Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Bartlett v. Tribeca Lending Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Tribeca Lending Corp. v. BartlettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.