Legal Opinion

State v. . Black

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 21, 1909PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from police justice’s court, tried, de novo, before Ward, 17., and a jury, at November Term, 1908, of BuNcombe.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

The defendant was convicted in the police court of Asheville for keeping a disorderly house, and appealed to the Superior Court. Upon a trial de novo he was found guilty by a jury and sentenced to twenty-two months’ imprisonment. He presses but one ground of appeal in his brief, which is that, by the charter of Asheville (Private Laws 1901, ch. 100, sec. 77), keeping a disorderly house in that city is a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine not exceeding fifty dollars or imprisonment not exceeding thirty days.

If this- exception were well taken, the defendant would not be entitled to a new trial,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. . LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  2. State v. CrowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  3. State v. AustinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  4. State v. . McCoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Shetsky v. UtechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. State v. . CherrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. State v. . FreshwaterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. State v. . ShipmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API