Emmanuel Brunswick & Co. v. McClay
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Lancaster county.
1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.
The action below was brought by the plaintiffs in error to obtain the possession of two billiard tables and *138accompanying furniture, which they claimed under a chattel mortgage executed to them by Michael Graham. The defendant had levied upon and held the property by virtue of several executions in favor of Graham’s creditors. The court, without the aid of a jury, found the issues generally in favor of the defendant, and rendered judgment accordingly, to reverse which the case is brought here.
Six errors are formally assigned, but being substantially alike, they are fairly included within the…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Moors v. ReadingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
- Second National Bank v. GilbertIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Tomer v. DensmoreNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
- Swiggett v. DodsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
- Moser v. ClaesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.