Legal Opinion

Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. Hickman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 9, 1959No. 37715Published

1Opinion of the Court

100 Ga. App. 348 (1959)

111 S.E.2d 380

MUTUAL BENEFIT HEALTH & ACCIDENT ASSOCIATION OF OMAHA

v.

HICKMAN.

37715.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided September 9, 1959.

Rehearing Denied October 8, 1959.

Hull, Willingham, Towill & Norman, W. Hale Barrett, Lewis & Lewis, Preston B. Lewis, for plaintiff in error.

H. Cliff Hatcher, contra.

QUILLIAN, Judge.

1. The only general grounds of the motion for new trial insisted on in this court and the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict raise the single question as to whether the verdict was supported by some evidence.

The motion for new trial assigns as…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Nichols; Concurrence · Felton.

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Napier v. StrongCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  3. Harrison v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
  4. Bryant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  5. Haiman & Brother v. Moses & GerrardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1869

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API