American Home Assurance Co. v. Stephens
Texas Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This case comes to us on a certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The question is “[wjhether it is against public policy for an insurer to limit coverage for a therapist’s non-sexual misconduct because sexual misconduct is alleged to have occurred in the same or related course of professional treatment, even though such sexual misconduct is immaterial to the non-sexual misconduct claims asserted.” 1 After careful consideration of the question, we conclude that Judge Reavley correctly applied Texas law in his dissent to the panel opinion that was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- American Home Assurance Company, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Billy Carl Stephens, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant, Rory RossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- American Home Assurance Co. v. StephensCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
3Cited by5 opinions
- American Home Assurance Co. v. McDonaldNew York Supreme Court · 1999
- American Home Assurance v. McDonaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- American Home Assurance Co. v. StephensCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Proselect Insurance v. LevySupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- ProSelect Insurance Company v. LevyVermont Superior Court · 2010