Legal Opinion

American Home Assurance Co. v. Stephens

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1999No. 98-0396PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This case comes to us on a certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The question is “[wjhether it is against public policy for an insurer to limit coverage for a therapist’s non-sexual misconduct because sexual misconduct is alleged to have occurred in the same or related course of professional treatment, even though such sexual misconduct is immaterial to the non-sexual misconduct claims asserted.” 1 After careful consideration of the question, we conclude that Judge Reavley correctly applied Texas law in his dissent to the panel opinion that was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American Home Assurance Company, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Billy Carl Stephens, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant, Rory RossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  2. American Home Assurance Co. v. StephensCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. American Home Assurance Co. v. McDonaldNew York Supreme Court · 1999
  2. American Home Assurance v. McDonaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. American Home Assurance Co. v. StephensCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  4. Proselect Insurance v. LevySupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  5. ProSelect Insurance Company v. LevyVermont Superior Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API