Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided January 28, 1988PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Joel M. Goldberg, J.

The question on this motion to dismiss is whether an allegation of misdemeanor cocaine possession (Penal Law § 220.03) is legally sufficient when a police laboratory report shows the "weight/quantity” to be "residue”. For the reasons stated below, I hold "residue” possession to be legally sufficient. No minimum weight need be shown to prove a violation of Penal Law § 220.03, although in cases of possession of small amounts, it may be difficult to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt since "knowing” possession is an element of the crime. However, this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. PippinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  2. People v. SheltonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1987
  3. People v. IfillCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1987
  4. People v. MasonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1987
  5. People v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. MizellNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. State v. TaylorMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. People v. JamesCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1988
  4. State v. TaylorMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API