Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Finnigan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 21, 1994PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In a proceeding for visitation pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Orange County (Bivona, J.), entered December 10, 1991, which, inter alia, directed (1) that he have no visitation with his child until the child reaches the age of majority, and (2) that before any visitation could occur after the child reaches the age of majority, "the child must have a therapist state unequivocally that it is not detrimental for the child to visit with the father at * * * whatever facility he may be incarcerated at”.

*593Ordered that the order is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eric L. v. Dorothy L.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Wise v. Del ToroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Verdino v. VerdinoNew York City Family Court · 1988

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rogowski v. RogowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Rhynes v. RhynesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Bowers v. BowersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Davis v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Lozada v. PintoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API