Lapham v. Tarabusi
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiffs brought summary proceedings against defendants. There was judgment for plaintiffs. Defendants bring error claiming want of jurisdiction because of no personal service of summons on defendants. The attorneys for the parties stipulated in writing to continue the case from August 6, 1928, to August 13, 1928. Such stipulation for continuance amounts to a general appearance. 4 C. J. p. 1345; Waldron v. Palmer, 104 Mich. 556. The circuit court commissioner acquired jurisdiction. A general appeal was taken to the circuit court. This amounted to a general appearance (4 C. J. p. 1346), and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Waldron v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by6 opinions
- Deeb v. BerriMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- In Re Parker's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Miller v. Sutro Bros. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Wolf v. CohenMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Bristol v. Kalamazoo CollegeMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.