Poteet v. Special Indemnity Fund
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
Pertinent to the questions raised in this review or original action, this record discloses that the claimant prosecuted his claim against his employer, the White Motor Com*441pany, and the Special Indemnity Fund, and showed by his evidence that claimant had sustained an old injury to one of his eyes which resulted in a permanent partial obvious loss of vision of 20 per cent. He does not here complain of the award made by the commission against his employer for permanent partial disability to his hand by reason of the new injury. Claimant’s sole contention here is that the commission erroneously…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Special Indemnity Fund v. PogueSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Special Indemnity Fund v. EdmondsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Special Indemnity Fund v. WoodrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Special Indemnity Fund v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Special Indemnity Fund of the State v. StoveallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.