Legal Opinion

John Forrest v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 15, 2019No. 18-1011PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLLOTON, Circuit Judge.

John Forrest appeals an order of the district court 1 denying his successive motion to correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 . We conclude that Forrest does not meet the requirements of § 2255(h)(2) for filing a successive motion, and we therefore affirm the denial of relief.

Forrest was convicted in 2009 on one count of unlawful possession of a firearm as a felon. See 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1). Under the Armed Career Criminal Act, he was subject to a mandatory minimum sentence of fifteen years' imprisonment if he had sustained three prior convictions for a "violent…

Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Welch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Pamela Golinveaux v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brooks v. HaynesDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2020
  2. Dye v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2020
  3. John Forrest v. Thahesha JusinoDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API