In re Reynolds
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
JiPER CURIAM.
Respondent, Glynn W. Reynolds, was formally charged with commingling and converting to his own use succession funds with which he was entrusted in violation of Rules of Professional Conduct 1.3 (diligence), 1.4 (communication with clients), 1.5 (fees), and 8.4(a) (violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct), 8.4(b) (commission of a criminal act), and 8.4(c) (engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation). Full restitution was made. Respondent and Disciplinary Counsel reached an *373agreement for consent discipline; respondent…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cited by4 opinions
- In re CrooksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
- In re CrooksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
- In re ReynoldsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
- State v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983