Legal Opinion

In re Reynolds

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 16, 1997No. 95-B-3059PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

JiPER CURIAM.

Respondent, Glynn W. Reynolds, was formally charged with commingling and converting to his own use succession funds with which he was entrusted in violation of Rules of Professional Conduct 1.3 (diligence), 1.4 (communication with clients), 1.5 (fees), and 8.4(a) (violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct), 8.4(b) (commission of a criminal act), and 8.4(c) (engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation). Full restitution was made. Respondent and Disciplinary Counsel reached an *373agreement for consent discipline; respondent…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re CrooksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  2. In re CrooksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  3. In re ReynoldsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  4. State v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API