Legal Opinion

People v. Tolewitzke

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1952No. Docket 91, Calendar 44,952PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBtjshnell, J.

Defendant George E. Tolewitzke was granted leave to appeal from a sentence of 2 to 10 years after conviction by a jury of the crime of statutory rape.

The record is scanty and insufficient. It only contains a portion of the material testimony, notwithstanding the certificate of the trial judge that the hill of exceptions “constitutes the testimony taken and the proceedings had in said canse and the whole thereof.”

Appellant claims that “prejudicial, incompetent and inflammatory” statements were made by the prosecutor in the presence of the jury. No specific objectionable statements are…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. MacPhersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  2. People v. OlmsteadMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  3. People v. GotshallMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  4. People v. PrinzMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  5. People v. CahoonMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. People v. WhalenMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  3. People v. GuillettMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  4. People v. BoucheeMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. TolliverOhio Court of Appeals · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API