Legal Opinion

Foust Ex Rel. Foust v. Kinley

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 13, 1962No. 50701PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMooke, J.

— This is a law action by Wayne Foust, a minor, by his father, Ray Foust, and Ray Foust to recover damages, including medical expenses, sustained by Wayne when struck by a golf club at defendants’ driving range. At the close of plaintiffs’ evidence the court sustained defendants’ motion for a directed verdict. Plaintiffs have appealed from judgment thereon. We agree with the trial court.

I. In considering the propriety of a directed verdict for defendants the court gives plaintiffs’ evidence the most favorable construction it will reasonably bear. Rule 344(f) (2), Rules of Civil Procedure,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lindquist v. Des Moines Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  2. Jackson v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  3. Hawkins v. Maine & New Hampshire Theaters Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1933
  4. Clark v. Monroe County Fair Assn.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  5. Williams v. Mineral City Park Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Boyer v. Iowa High School Athletic AssociationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  2. Martinko v. H-N-W AssociatesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
  3. Grall v. MeyerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  4. Parsons v. National Dairy Cattle CongressSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  5. Wright v. Midwest Old Settlers & Threshers Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API