Legal Opinion

Jewett & Co. v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 17, 1932No. 3PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

L. HAND, Circuit Judge.

Tho taxpayer, a stove manufacturer,, claimed certain deductions in its income tax returns for the years 1924 and 1925, due to obsolescence of its patterns for casting. On March 1, 1913, the cost or value of! the patterns owned by it was $101,297.04, to which was added, up to and including 1923, $22,-786.22, making $124,083.26 in all. .The additions of 1924 and 1925 were $2,299.95 and $1,371.78, respectively. The Commissioner computed a deduction of ten per cent, as depreciation for obsolescence, each year, beginning with 3 913, which left nothing after 1923 as a base…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Uncasville Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Foss v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1935
  2. Beaumont v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
  3. Washburn Wire Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1933
  4. Heywood Boot & Shoe Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1935
  5. Beaumont v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API