Tuttle v. Division of Administration, State of Florida Department of Transportation
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
The owners received a disappointing verdict in this condemnation case. The trial court entered judgment on the verdict and the owners appealed. The only element of compensation disputed at the trial was that of business damage cognizable under § 73.071(3) (b), F.S., 1973. On that subject the condemning authority offered no opinion evidence either that no damage was sustained or that it was sustained in a specific amount. We are asked by the appealing owners to apply to their benefit the rule of City of Jacksonville v. Yerkes, 282 So.2d 645 (Fla.App. 1st, 1973), cert. den. 291…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Daniels v. State Road DepartmentSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
- City of Tampa v. Texas CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- Behm v. Division of Admin., State, Dept. of Transp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Parker v. ArmstrongDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
- State Road Department v. Abel Investment CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Behm v. DIVISION. OF ADMIN., STATE DEPT. OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Florida · 1976
- City of Tallahassee v. BoydDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Tuttle v. Division of Administration, State Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Florida · 1976