Middleditch v. Williams
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On appeal from a decree advised by the vice-ordinary, whose opinion is reported in 18 Stew. Eq. 726.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Reed, J.
The argument of this cause was arrested in limine upon the suggestion of the court that the appellants seemed to have no 'interest in the subject-matter of the litigation, and so had no standing as a party to the cause. The cause was retained to receive briefs and to await further advisement upon this prefatory question.
The following, I think, is a sufficient statement of facts to disclose the attitude of the appellants toward the matters involved in the suit: The appellants filed a caveat against the probate of the will of "William H.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Clark v. FisherNew York Court of Chancery · 1828
3Cited by8 opinions
- Girard Trust Co. v. SchmitzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941
- In Re RaynoldsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1942
- In Re HooverNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- In Re ColemanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- In Re GaetaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.