Legal Opinion

Sunbeam Corp. v. Wentling

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 10, 1950No. 3400PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOLLMER, District Judge.

This is a suit for injunctive relief and damages under the Fair Trade Act of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, approved June 5, 1935, P.L. 266, as amended June 12, 1941, P.L. 128.

The title to the said Act reads as follows: “To protect trade-mark owners, distributors, and the public against injuries and uneconomic practices in the distribution of articles of standard quality under a distinguished trade-mark, 'brand or name.”

The pertinent portion of the Act, as amended, provides as follows, 73 P.S. §§ 7 and 8:

“No contract relating to the sale or resale of a commodity…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Old Dearborn Distributing Co. v. Seagram-Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Shipman v. DuPreSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Bristol-Myers Co. v. Lit Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Miles Laboratories, Inc. v. SeigniousDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sunbeam Corp. v. WentlingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  2. General Electric Co. v. SabreenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API