Legal Opinion

People v. DeLeyden

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 19, 1961PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

It was not an abuse of discretion, in this speeding case, for the Justice of the Peace to permit the reopening of the People’s case. We further hold that in this nonjury trial, which was prosecuted by a Deputy Sheriff, it was not error for the Justice to question the witness in order to elicit sufficient facts to enable him to reach a decision (see People v. Mendes, 3 N Y 2d 120, 121; People v. Bilanchuk, 280 App. Div. 180, 182-183).

The order appealed from should be reversed, the information reinstated, and the matter remitted to the County Court for consideration of the other grounds urged…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. BilanchukAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. SoddanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. People v. ChristensenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. People v. VialCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1986
  4. People v. AnonymousCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1984
  5. Haggerty v. HimeleinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API