United States v. Armco Steel Corporation
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, District Judge.
There are two ultimate questions to be decided:
First: Whether or not jeopardy did attach to Count 2 in this case, that is, can the Government again file and prosecute to judgment the same indictment as is contained in Count 2 against the same defendants, except for those pleading nolo?
Second: If jeopardy did attach to Count 2, does it attach under the facts in this case as to Count 1, as every - case must be decided on its own facts.
The resolution of these questions requires the examination and decision of several other questions, some not raised or argued by counsel.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- United States v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Downum v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. American Honda Motor CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1967
- SWEPI, LP v. Mora CountyDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- United States v. American Honda Motor CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1967
- State v. GowinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- United States v. Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.