Legal Opinion

Sandford v. Carr

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1856PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Application to compel a witness examined upon supplementary proceedings to answer a question propounded.

1Opinion of the CourtDavies, J.

The defendant in this action has been examined, under the provisions of the Code, authorizing proceedings to the execution. The proceedings are a substitute for a creditor’s bill, so well known under our former system in the Court of Chancery.

*463The object of the provisions of section 292 of the Code is, to discover property of the defendant which ought to be applied upon the judgment recovered against him. Eor this purpose, it authorizes a judge to make an order requiring the judgment debtor to appear and answer concerning the property which he unjustly refuses to apply towards the satisfaction…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eikenberry & Co. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  2. Schwab v. CohenCity of New York Municipal Court · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API