Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Kean v. Kean

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided July 24, 2015No. 2140029Published

1Concurrence

THOMPSON, Presiding Judge,

concurring in part and concurring in the result in part as to the appeal and concurring in the result as to the cross-appeal.

With regard to the issue of child support, I agree that the trial court erred in failing to consider the income of Christine Kean (“the wife”) from her trust as a component of her gross income for the purpose of calculating child support. For the purposes of calculating child support, a parent’s “gross income”

“includes income from any source, and includes, but is not limited to, salaries, wages, commissions, bonuses, dividends, severance pay,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nowell v. NowellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  2. Ex Parte ElliottSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Morgan v. MorganCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2014
  4. Wellborn v. WellbornCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  5. Payne v. PayneCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API