Legal Opinion
Goldsby v. Gulf Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided January 7, 1935PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTerrell, J.
The appellee executed- a contract of insurance in favor of appellant containing the following provisions :
“Weekly benefits at the rate specified in the schedule will be paid each seven days (a) for each day that the insured is by reason of illness under the care of a physician and necessarily confined to bed, except where the insured is a male whose place of employment is' away from his residence, confinement within the house and medical attention therein if preceded by at least one week’s confinement to bed shall be sufficient.”
The bill of complaint in this cause was filed March 8, 1932. It…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Imperial Fire Insurance v. Coos CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. CartmelSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
- Price v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Gautier v. BradwaySupreme Court of Florida · 1924
3Cited by18 opinions
- Voelker v. Combined Ins. Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Rigel v. National Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Anthony D. Duke v. Joel Hoch, Home Indemnity Company, Garnishee-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- United States Fire Ins. Co. v. MorejonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
- Oren v. General Accident Fire and Life Assur. Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.