Legal Opinion

Johnston v. Davis

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1886PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion for rehearing. The facts are stated in the opinion, and in the-report of the main case, found in 60’Mich. 56.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

Motion for rehearing. It is claimed by defendant’s counsel that the Court misunderstood the facts in the record, as shown by the opinion heretofore filed in this case. It is also contended that our decision of the-cause seems to-be based upon the misapprehension of facts claimed.

We have carefully re-examined the record.. It is true,, as *279stated by counsel in their brief, that we said in the opinion that the jury found specifically in favor of plaintiffs’ claim, which was in substance that the master of the Oconto agreed to bring the boiler up for $100, and land it upon plaintiffs’ dock, when…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nichols, Shepard & Co. v. MarshMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API