Hartz v. Page
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtArnold, J.
This is an action based upon two accounts involving the purchase of corn, payment for pasturage and for services of a veterinarian, in connection with the feeding and care of certain cattle. The suit originally was directed against defendants Charles G. Page and Paul Parkyn but there was no service on Parkyn and the cause was dismissed as to him.
The amended petition upon which the cause was tried is in two counts. The first alleges Charles G. Page and Paul Parkyn were partners in the business of. pasturing and feeding cattle and speculating in the same; that for a number of years they had…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Paddock v. SomesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
- Wetmore v. CrouchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- Jordan v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- Stanley v. WhitlowMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
- Simmons v. IngramMissouri Court of Appeals · 1899
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Boyd v. MargolinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- Kearns v. SparksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953