Legal Opinion

Burch v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 20, 2002No. 1D00-3801Published

1Per curiam

Appellant, David Burch, claims error as to various conditions of his probation imposed by the trial court in its written order below. Specifically, he challenges the portions of the probation order requiring him to pay for random drug and alcohol testing; to pay a 4% surcharge on all payments ordered by the court; and to pay $1.00 per month to First Step, Inc. of Jackson County. None of these conditions were orally pronounced at sentencing.

The State concedes error as to the first two conditions, and we therefore reverse and remand as to the requirement that Appellant pay for drug and alcohol…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. HartSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  2. Justice v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  3. Brock v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  4. Carter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  5. Torres v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API