Legal Opinion

McDonald v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 20, 1996No. 96-21PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

679 So.2d 1273 (1996)

George Risdon McDONALD, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 96-21.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 20, 1996.

George Risdon McDonald, Wewahitchka, Pro Se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Sonya Roebuck Horbelt, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

2Per curiam

The appellant challenges a sentence imposed after the court ordered resentencing pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The appellant had the right to be represented by counsel at this resentencing. Chestnut v. State, 578 So.2d 27 (Fla. 5th DCA…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. ScottSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  2. Chestnut v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. Busl v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  2. Bines v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  3. Bush v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  4. Morris v. BussDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API