Legal Opinion

Ayre & Lord Tie Co. v. Baker

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 24, 1910PublishedCited by 5 opinions

CASH 65. — SUIT BY SARAH C. DOBBS BAKER AGAINST THE AYER & LORD TIB COMPANY. Appeal from Muhlenberg Circuit Court. W. P. Sandidge, Circuit Judge. Decree for complainant, and defendants appeal.—

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Wm. Rogers Clay,

Commissioner — Reversing.

Sarah C. Dobbs (now Sarah C. Baker) received, from her husband by a former marriage $700, which he had deposited to her credit in the G-reen River Deposit Bank. She entered into a contract with one W. H. Cox, whereby she agreed to purchase from him a tract of land containing 150 acres, located in Muhlenberg county, Ky. The purchase price to be paid was $1,200., Having on hand only $700, appellee arranged to raise the remaining $500 of the purchase price in the following manner: M. D. Tipton agreed to take 59 acres of the land at…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bull v. SevierCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1889
  2. Dulaney v. FiggCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  3. Floyd v. MackeyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lockhart v. Kentland Coal & Coke Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  2. Estep v. Kentland Coal & Coke Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
  3. Looney v. Elkhorn Land & Improvement Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  4. Pool v. StephensonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  5. Buford v. MochySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API