Legal Opinion
Schnur v. Mehl
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 27, 1980PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
an action to recover damages, inter alia, for breach of contract, gross negligence and emotional distress, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered June 4, 1979, which, after treating the motion of defendants Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., and Leonard Gordon to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 7) as one for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [c]) and 3212, granted the motion as to those causes of action asserted against the movants. Plaintiffs further purport to appeal from so much of a memorandum decision…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rovello v. Orofino Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Johnson v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- O'HARA v. Del BelloNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Maybrown v. Malverne Distributors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- O'Hara v. Del BelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
3Cited by5 opinions
- Albino v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Schoonmaker Homes—John Steinberg, Inc. v. Village of MaybrookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Leonard Smith, Inc. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Gedney Ass'n v. State of New York Department of Mental HygieneNew York Supreme Court · 1982
- Ross v. KeonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985