Legal Opinion

Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Kinney

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1886No. 12,470PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Bartholomew Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.

This was a suit by Emanuel H. Kinney against the Western Union Telegraph Company, to recover a penalty of one hundred dollars, under the provisions of section 4176, E. S. 1881, for the alleged failure of the company to transmit a dispatch, as it was required by law to do.

The complaint charged that the defendant was, at the time it was filed, engaged in telegraphing for the public, and had •a line of telegraphic wires, partly within the State of Indiana, which extended from the city of Columbus, in said State, to Hillsdale, in the State of Michigan; that the plaintiff, on the 21st day of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. ReedIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. AxtellIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. PendletonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. TrissalIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Burnett v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. CoyleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. BoegliIndiana Supreme Court · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API