Legal Opinion
L & L Painting Co. v. Columbia Sussex Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 18, 1996PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The appellant asserted a cross claim and a counterclaim for foreclosure of its own mechanic’s lien when it was named as a defendant in this action, as it was required to do (see, Lien Law § 44 [5]). The amended notice of pendency filed by the plaintiff continued the appellant’s mechanic’s lien (see, Lien Law § 17). The appellant, a plaintiff for purposes of its own claims (see, CPLR 3019 [d]), is, therefore, a proper party to seek an extension of the plaintiff’s amended notice of pendency in order to preserve its own mechanic’s lien, which would otherwise terminate (see, CPLR 6513; Lien Law §…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stassou v. Casini & Huang Construction, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Tomei v. PizzitolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by6 opinions
- Youngok Lim v. Sangbom LyiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Hall v. PiazzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Knopf v. SanfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Knopf v. SanfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Miller v. FuentesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.