Legal Opinion
State v. Papizan
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 2, 2017No. NUMBER 2017 KA 0028PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGuidry, J.
*1094The defendant, Michael Scott Papizan, was charged by bill of information with aggravated crime against nature. The trial court granted a motion to quash the refiled bill, finding the state flaunted its authority by dismissing defendant's previous bill of information on the same charge then refiling the present bill. The state appeals. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On October 21, 2015, the defendant was first charged with aggravated crime against nature. See La. R.S. 14:89.1A(2). According to the affidavit of probable cause, during 2015, the defendant inappropriately touched his son's…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Of Louisiana v. Anthony MillerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2021
- State Of Louisiana v. Patricia M. CurrieLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2021
- State Of Louisiana v. Terance Roshell DawsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2020
- State Of Louisiana v. Walter JohnsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2020
- State of Louisiana v. Derrick L. SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.