Briscoe v. Worley
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Dissent
HALLEY, V. C. J.
(dissenting). I think the majority opinion is wrong, for the reason that the defendant co-partnership owed no duty to the deceased, the wife of the plaintiff; and further, because there was no negligence on the part of the defendant.
The facts in the ease are simple. Standard Paving Company had a contract with the state to construct a bridge over Briar creek, and to assist it in the construction of that bridge had made what is referred to in the record as a “by-pass”, “shoo-fly”, or “detour” around the bridge and across Briar creek, on the east side of the highway between…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Clinkenbeard v. City of St. JosephSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
- Standard Theaters Corp. v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Seelye v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1942
- Shawano County v. Froemming Bros.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- Toler v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.