Legal Opinion · Dissent

Briscoe v. Worley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 28, 1952No. 35125Published

1Dissent

HALLEY, V. C. J.

(dissenting). I think the majority opinion is wrong, for the reason that the defendant co-partnership owed no duty to the deceased, the wife of the plaintiff; and further, because there was no negligence on the part of the defendant.

The facts in the ease are simple. Standard Paving Company had a contract with the state to construct a bridge over Briar creek, and to assist it in the construction of that bridge had made what is referred to in the record as a “by-pass”, “shoo-fly”, or “detour” around the bridge and across Briar creek, on the east side of the highway between…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Clinkenbeard v. City of St. JosephSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  2. Standard Theaters Corp. v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Seelye v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1942
  4. Shawano County v. Froemming Bros.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Toler v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API