Legal Opinion
People v. DiMora
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 17, 1992No. B060542PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
YEGAN, J.
cases have held it was error for a sentencing court to delegate to the probation department the determination of the amount and manner of restitution to be paid by a probationer. They have been superseded by the enactment of Penal Code section 1203.1k when the probationer consents to this procedure. Probationers who thereafter disagree with the amount or manner of restitution, may bring a motion in the trial court and object thereto. If still not satisfied the probationer may then appeal from the trial court’s determination.
Alfred John DiMora was convicted by plea of two…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. HarveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. BlessingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- People v. VournazosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. WeathertonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Gray v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016