Legal Opinion · Dissent

Manhattan Embassy Co. v. Burns

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 26, 2000Published

1DissentMcCooe, J.

I respectfully dissent. The enactment of Real Property Law § 226-b reflects the legislative intent to limit the sublet rights and remedies of landlords and tenants to those statutorily specified, whether or not greater rights in the lease predate the passage of the law. This intent is clearly shown by comparing the disparate statutory treatment of assignment and sublet rights in the same section which specifically authorizes greater contractual rights for an assignment but is silent as to a subletting. Subdivision (1) applies to assignments and subdivision (2) to sublets.

“Section 226-b. Right…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rima 106, L.P. v. AlvarezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. 72nd Street Associates v. PyleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. McDermott v. PintoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. 72nd Street Associates v. PyleAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API