Legal Opinion

Pusakowski v. Woodward Lumber & Supply Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 13, 1917PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, who filed the following opinion: It seems to me that the order to show cause and the ad interim restraint in this cause- should be set aside.

Read the full summary

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, who filed the following opinion: It seems to me that the order to show cause and the ad interim restraint in this cause- should be set aside. I am not at all satisfied that the entire questions involved in the case and now presented by the bill were not settled by the order made by Vice-Chancellor Stevenson, and, further, -that the decision of Judge Tennant on the application made in the law court to have the judgment satisfied was not conclusive; but, aside from this, it does not appear from the proofs before…

1Opinion of the Court

Per, Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the. reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis.'

*668For affirmance—Garrison, Swayzb, Bergen, Minturn, ICalisci-i, Black, Wi-iite, I-Ieppeni-ibimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner—11. ' For reversal—None.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brunetti v. GrandiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1918
  2. De Masi v. F.W. Bowden Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API