Ronald Cassady and Joseph Elbert Clements v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellants, convicted on a jury verdict of knowingly transporting a stolen vehicle in interstate commerce in violation of the Dyer Act, seek reversal of their convictions on various grounds, only two of which deserve comment. It is urged that the District Court committed error in admitting a photostatic copy of a portion of the rental contract by which appellants obtained possession of the vehicle, and in admitting certain credit cards and evidence of their use by appellants during the interstate transportation of the vehicle. We affirm.
The copy of the car rental contract was improperly…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Shelton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Logan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Franklin D. Wilson and Gary Wayne BugbeeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Franklin D. Wilson and Gary Wayne BugbeeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978