Legal Opinion

Ronald Cassady and Joseph Elbert Clements v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 9, 1968No. 24563PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants, convicted on a jury verdict of knowingly transporting a stolen vehicle in interstate commerce in violation of the Dyer Act, seek reversal of their convictions on various grounds, only two of which deserve comment. It is urged that the District Court committed error in admitting a photostatic copy of a portion of the rental contract by which appellants obtained possession of the vehicle, and in admitting certain credit cards and evidence of their use by appellants during the interstate transportation of the vehicle. We affirm.

The copy of the car rental contract was improperly…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shelton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
  2. Logan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Franklin D. Wilson and Gary Wayne BugbeeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. United States v. Franklin D. Wilson and Gary Wayne BugbeeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API