In re Patterson-MacDonald Shipbuilding Co.

(after stating the facts as above). I think the last statement can be dismissed with the suggestion that it is inconsistent with the amended claim tendered, and likewise with the claim which it is sought to establish, and is not consistent with the issue that was determined by the referee, and the claim is not within the scope of section 57a, Bankruptcy Act. Section 57a, Bankruptcy Act, provided that;

“Proof of claims shall consist of a statement under oath, in writing signed by a creditor setting forth the claim, the consideration therefor, and whether any, and, if so what, securities are…