Legal Opinion

Prior v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 28, 1990No. 89-1134PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a conviction for contempt of court. The evidence is insufficient to establish that appellant engaged in willful conduct or acted in a manner calculated to hinder the orderly process of the court. The evidence is insufficient to establish that appellant intentionally violated any rule or order of the court or conducted himself in such a manner as to display contempt for the court. The evidence, at best, demonstrates that appellant was negligent in failing to appear at the proper time for trial. The only reasonable inference from the evidence is that appellant was either…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thomson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Litus v. McGregorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Sewell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. Stevens v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Espinal v. RyanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  2. Werner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  3. B.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API