Starter Corporation v. Converse, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
The Starter Corporation appeals from the district court’s dismissal of its declaratory-judgment complaint against appellee Converse, Inc. on the ground that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, and its pronouncement that it would decline to exercise declaratory judgment jurisdiction even if an “actual case or controversy” did exist.
Starter is a manufacturer of athletic apparel and Converse is a manufacturer of athletic footwear and licensor of sports apparel. Both parties possess trademark rights in versions of a five-pointed star. This dispute arises out of Starter’s planned use of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Arrowhead Industrial Water, Inc. v. Ecolochem, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- G. Heileman Brewing Company, Inc., and Miller Brewing Company, Cross-Appellants v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Paul A. Muller and Celfil Company Establishment v. Olin Mathieson Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Nike, Inc. v. ALREADY, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Starter Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Converse, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Dixon v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- Vantage Trailers, Inc. v. Beall Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Dow Jones & Co., Inc. v. Harrods, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.