Legal Opinion · Dissent

Reid v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 17, 1987No. 73309Published

1DissentDeen, Presiding Judge

Insofar as it was undisputed that the appellant had actual knowledge that the service wire was placed on the ground, summary judgment for the appellee was proper. Tidwell v. Southern Bell Tel. &c. Co., 156 Ga. App. 153 (274 SE2d 137) (1980); Shamis v. Southern Bell Tel. &c. Co., 155 Ga. App. 513 (271 SE2d 658) (1980). Her assertion that she thought that the wire had already been buried is unavailing, since the fact that no trench (seventy-five feet long) had been dug certainly provided adequate notice to the appellant that the wire had not yet been buried. See Apostol-Athanasiou v. White, 176…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Apostol-Athanasiou v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  2. Shamis v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  3. Tidwell v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API