Legal Opinion

Joseph A. Celano v. James B. Peake

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided January 6, 2009No. 07-0932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOELEN, Judge:

The pro se appellant, Joseph A. Celano, appeals a March 20, 2007, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board or BVA) decision in which the Board denied his claim for entitlement to a retroactive award of educational assistance benefits pursuant to chapter 1606 of title 10, U.S.Code (the Montgomery GI Bill-Selected Reserve, hereinafter “MGIB-SR” or “Chapter 1606”), for courses he had enrolled in from January 24 to March 24, 1994, and from September 14 to December 22, 1999. Record (R.) at 1-7. This appeal is timely, and the Court has jurisdiction to review the Board’s decision pursuant…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. David A. Mays v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API