Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Golden

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 20, 2003No. 1-00-3181 RelPublished

1Dissent

PRESIDING JUSTICE SOUTH,

dissenting’:

I would find that the crime was committed in a brutal and heinous manner, indicative of wanton cruelty. I therefore respectfully dissent.

As the majority correctly notes, the issue is whether the Apprendi violation constituted plain error because defendant did not object at the time of trial. See People v. Crespo, 203 Ill. 2d 335, 347 (2001). I would find that the record supports a finding of brutal and heinous conduct.

In People v. La Pointe, 88 Ill. 2d 482, 501 (1981), our supreme court held that the phrase “ ‘brutal or heinous behavior, indicative of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. La PointeIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  2. People v. CrespoIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Bartolucci v. FalletiIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  4. People v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. People v. McGeeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API