Legal Opinion

Succession of Thomas

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 19, 1904No. 15,224PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Certiorari to Court of Appeals, Parish of Orleans. Application by Widow William Thomas and others for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal of the parish of Orleans.

1Opinion of the CourtLand, J.

The public administrator for the city of New Orleans was, after due notice by publication, appointed and qualified as administrator of the succession of William Thomas. The property of the estate consisted of six lots, which were appraised at $300. The court ordered the lots sold to pay debts, and the sale was advertised to take place on April 10, 1902.

Prior to the date of sale, Louis Thomas et al., representing themselves to be the children and widow of the deceased, filed a rule on the public administrator to show cause on April 11, 1902, why his appointment should not be declared null and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Succession of LehmannSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1889
  2. Linman v. RigginsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1888
  3. Ware v. CouvillionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  4. Heirs of Porter v. HornsbySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. D. H. Holmes Co. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
  2. Washington v. Holmes Barnes, LimitedSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  3. Levenson v. ChancellorLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Napier v. ChurchTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Granger v. HébertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API