Legal Opinion

Pless v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 15, 1923No. 14403PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

The bill of exceptions shows that two separate cases against the same defendant were by agreement tried together; that there were two separate verdicts of guilty, two separate judgments, *278two separate motions for a new trial, and two separate orders overruling the motions. The defendant seeks in this bill of exceptions to have both of these judgments reversed. This cannot be done. Fillingame v. State, 27 Ga. App. 764 (109 S. E. 916); Bridges v. State, 27 Ga. App. 767 (110 S. E. 412).

Decided May 15, 1923. II. A. Allen, for plaintiff in error. John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, E. A. Stephens,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fillingame v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  2. Bridges v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shearer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API