Legal Opinion

Jones v. Omnitrans

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 23, 2004No. E035295PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McKINSTER, J.

Jeffrey Jones appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after the trial court sustained Omnitrans’s demurrer to Jones’s petition for writ of mandate, without leave to amend.

Jones contends that he was deprived of his constitutionally protected property interest in continued employment with Omnitrans, a public transit agency, without due process of law because Omnitrans dismissed him and refused to afford him a posttermination hearing to contest his dismissal. He contends that the memorandum of understanding (MOU) between Omnitrans and his union, which provided for a…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Skelly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
  5. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jones v. OmnitransCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API